
WASHINGTON — The GOP-controlled Senate on Monday voted to advance the nomination of Tulsi Gabbard to be President Donald Trump’s director of national intelligence, putting her on a path to be confirmed this week. Limited time: Save 25% on NBC News subscription Get exclusive reporting, live Q&As and ad-free reading. The party-line vote was 52-46, with all Republicans present voting in favor of Gabbard. Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and John Fetterman, D-Pa., did not vote.
Main Idea: Tulsi Gabbard cleared a key Senate vote to advance her nomination as Trump’s director of national intelligence, putting her close to final confirmation.
Key Points:
Tulsi Gabbard’s likely confirmation could raise worry about weaker intelligence oversight, which may affect national security and public trust.
John Thune says Gabbard would refocus the intelligence community on core work, which could improve analysis and safety for Americans.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Central subject of the nomination vote and confirmation process discussed in the article.
The president who nominated Gabbard and whose staffing choice is a major focus.
Key Senate committee that advanced Gabbard’s nomination on a party-line vote.
Senate Majority Leader whose floor speech and scheduling actions are central to the article.
Senior Democrat quoted opposing the nomination with a substantive judgment on Gabbard.
The chamber taking the confirmation votes and procedural action on the nomination.
Mentioned as the next nomination the Senate planned to consider after Gabbard’s vote.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentNamed as another intelligence agency overseen by the director of national intelligence.
Mentioned in discussion of Gabbard’s past support for a pardon or clemency.
Named as one of the intelligence agencies overseen by the director of national intelligence.
Mentioned as the Syrian president involved in the controversial meeting cited by critics.
Mentioned in connection with Gabbard’s 2017 secret meeting with Bashar Assad.