
“This is simply the end.” Limited time: Save 25% on NBC News subscription Get exclusive reporting, live Q&As and ad-free reading. That was the five-word message that Rick Huganir, a neuroscientist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, received from a colleague just before 6 p.m. two Fridays ago, with news that would send a wave of panic through the scientific community.
Main Idea: President Donald Trump’s cuts to federal science funding and NIH overhead money are sparking panic at Johns Hopkins University and other research centers, with scientists warning that years of work could be stalled or lost.
Key Points:
NIH budget cuts could slow or stop medical research at Johns Hopkins and other labs, delaying new treatments for patients and risking jobs, grants, and local research spending.
Taxpayers could see less federal money spent on university overhead if the cuts survive.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Central political actor whose administration’s cuts and executive actions drive the story.
Major research institution directly affected by the NIH funding cuts and featured through its scientists.
Central agency implementing the indirect-cost funding cap and a key target of the article’s reporting.
Named Johns Hopkins neuroscientist whose research and reaction personify the impact of the policy.
Collective legal actors whose lawsuit led to the temporary halt of the NIH policy.
Named Johns Hopkins neuroscientist mentioned as the colleague who alerted Huganir to the policy.
White House spokesperson quoted defending the administration’s rationale for the cuts.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentNamed university cited as another affected institution in the lawsuit context.
Publication quoted through its editor-in-chief on the broader implications for research funding.