Washington — A federal judge ruled Friday that President Trump's executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie is unconstitutional and permanently blocked the administration from enforcing it. In a 102-page decision, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled in favor of the firm and said Mr. Trump's directive that sought to punish it sent the message that "lawyers must stick to the party line, or else.
Main Idea: A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting Perkins Coie is unconstitutional and permanently blocked it.
Key Points:
The ruling shows a fight over government power that can create more legal uncertainty for workers, clients, and firms tied to federal contracts.
The decision may protect free speech and due process, which helps voters and businesses avoid government punishment for unpopular views.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Federal judge whose ruling is the central action in the article.
Law firm at the center of the lawsuit and the ruling.
His executive order targeting Perkins Coie is the core subject of the story.
Court issuing the ruling that permanently blocked enforcement of the executive order.
One of the other law firms mentioned as challenging similar executive orders.
Law firm mentioned as having an executive order rescinded after agreeing to terms.
One of the other law firms mentioned as challenging similar executive orders.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentCentral government body that urged the judge to dismiss the case.
One of the other law firms mentioned as challenging similar executive orders.
Mentioned because Perkins Coie represented her in the 2016 election.
Mentioned in background as part of Perkins Coie's past work.