
A judge’s ruling to resentence Erik and Lyle Menendez last week gave the siblings something they’ve not had in more than three decades: a chance that they could leave the Southern California prison where they’re incarcerated. Limited time: Save 25% on NBC News subscription Get exclusive reporting, live Q&As and ad-free reading.
Main Idea: Erik and Lyle Menendez won a major step toward freedom when a judge resentenced them, but they still must clear more legal hurdles before they could be released.
Key Points:
The parole fight may keep victims' families and California officials tied up in a high-profile case, with more public attention and legal costs.
Judge Michael Jesic’s ruling could let the Menendez brothers be considered for release, reinforcing rehab as a path out of prison for some older offenders.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
One of the two central subjects of the article; his resentencing and parole eligibility are the main focus.
One of the two central subjects of the article; his resentencing and parole eligibility are the main focus.
The parole board that may hear the brothers’ case and decide suitability for parole.
The state department overseeing the parole system and involved in converting the hearings.
Former Los Angeles County district attorney whose recommendation for resentencing is central to the case.
California governor whose clemency role and potential approval of parole are central to the next steps.
The judge whose resentencing ruling created the brothers’ path to parole consideration.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentThe court that issued the resentencing ruling central to the article.
Current Los Angeles County district attorney whose opposition to resentencing is a major part of the dispute.
The state’s parole and clemency system is the setting for the brothers’ bid for release, but it is.
Appears as the jurisdiction tied to the district attorney’s office and the court action, but is not itself.
Streaming service whose documentary is cited as having renewed attention on the case.