
WASHINGTON — Delivering another major blow to LGBTQ rights, the Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld state laws that ban transgender athletes from participating in girls' and women's sports. Limited time: Save 25% on NBC News subscription Get exclusive reporting, live Q&As and ad-free reading. The court, largely divided 6-3, ruled against two transgender students, Becky Pepper-Jackson and Lindsay Hecox, who had challenged restrictive laws in West Virginia and Idaho, respectively.
Main Idea: The Supreme Court upheld state bans on transgender girls and women playing on girls' and women's sports teams.
Key Points:
The ruling may bar transgender students from school sports in many states, limiting participation and increasing conflict for families, schools, and communities.
Supporters may see clearer statewide rules for girls’ and women’s sports, which could reduce legal disputes and uncertainty for schools and leagues.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Authored the opinion and is quoted explaining the court’s reasoning.
One of the two named transgender students who challenged the state laws at the center of the case.
Central court that issued the ruling upholding state transgender sports bans.
One of the two named transgender students who challenged the state laws at the center of the case.
His administration sided with the states and he is described as a major political actor on transgender sports.
One of the two states whose law was upheld and is directly affected by the ruling.
Mentioned as the target of a Trump administration lawsuit over transgender athlete policy.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentMentioned as having changed its rules on transgender women’s participation in Olympic female categories.
Mentioned as having imposed new restrictions on transgender athletes.
Mentioned as having imposed new restrictions on transgender athletes.