
Good morning. When Victoria’s Secret reported stellar quarterly results last week, shares shot up 14% and likely gave Hillary Super some breathing room from the activist investors pushing the lingerie company to, among other things, consider whether the CEO of 16 months is up to the task of turning it around. Of course, the potential of having to deal with an activist investor’s campaign goes with the territory of being a CEO, especially at a company that has been struggling.
Main Idea: The article says Hillary Super at Victoria’s Secret is facing activist pressure, and argues that women CEOs are targeted more often than men, which may hurt companies by discouraging talent.
Key Points:
Bias against women CEOs may push boards to sideline strong leaders, which can hurt company performance, jobs, and investor returns.
Greater scrutiny of struggling firms can pressure management to fix weak business results faster.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
No entity suggestions or linked entities saved yet.
Victoria’s Secret’s CEO is a central figure in the article’s discussion of activist targeting of women CEOs.
Major company in the opening example of an activist-investor campaign against a female CEO.
Named as another company whose female CEO recently faced activist pressure.
Cracker Barrel’s CEO mentioned as someone who survived an activist campaign.
Vail Resorts’ CEO mentioned as someone who did not survive activist pressure.
Named as a company whose female CEO recently confronted activists.
Former PepsiCo CEO cited as a prominent example of activist conflict involving a woman CEO.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentFormer Yahoo CEO cited as one of several prominent women who tangled with activists.
Included as a company previously led by a prominent woman CEO named in the piece.