Your browser does not support the video element. The last three years have introduced most tech employees to the benefits of remote work. It means increased flexibility, not to mention the time and money saved on commuting. Companies, too, have seen certain benefits, giving them the ability to hire anyone, anywhere — and save on office space, too. But the whole thing has courted its share of controversies, too.
Main Idea: Tech companies are moving more jobs outside the US because remote work and a broken immigration system make it easier to hire abroad than bring workers into the country.
Key Points:
Groups & Affiliates:
More tech jobs may move overseas, which can mean fewer good jobs in the US and weaker local spending in tech hubs.
US firms may still fill hard-to-hire roles faster, which could help keep some services and products available.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Immigration services firm central to the article’s argument about visa frustrations driving overseas hiring.
The article discusses these named companies together as a central group.
Major consulting company cited in a filing about immigration hurdles limiting placement of employees.
Its tax division is quoted on companies exploring overseas opportunities due to immigration hurdles.
CEO of Envoy Global whose comments and company growth are used as key evidence.
Founder of Remote whose comments illustrate the boom in international hiring.
Startup central to the story’s theme of international hiring made easier by remote work.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentSalesforce CEO mentioned as an example of a leader walking back praise of remote work.
Named CEO cited for advocating H-1B reform.
Named CEO cited for advocating H-1B reform.