
When the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade three years ago, and abortion rights laws once again became state-level concerns, corporate America stepped up. Dobbs triggered bans in several states led by Republican lawmakers who oppose abortion. But companies with employees scattered across the country decided that workers in Texas or Arkansas, where abortion bans immediately took hold, deserved access to the same health care options as their peers in New York or Oregon.
Main Idea: Big companies like Google, Citi, and Levis have mostly kept abortion travel benefits in place after Roe was overturned, but they now talk about them quietly and frame them as general health care access.
Key Points:
Public fights over abortion travel benefits can deepen political tension and expose employers and workers to legal risk, even as states keep limiting care.
Google, Citi, and Levi’s keeping travel coverage can help workers in banned states get medical care they might not otherwise reach.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Named among the companies that created and still maintain abortion travel benefits.
One of the central employers discussed as having created or maintained abortion travel benefits.
Named among the companies that created and still maintain abortion travel benefits.
Major company cited as having created abortion travel benefits and as part of the broader corporate response.
Named as one of the companies still offering abortion travel benefits.
Named as one of the companies still offering abortion travel benefits.
Major company referenced through its leadership and prior public stance on abortion access.
Major company cited as having created abortion travel benefits and as part of the broader corporate response.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentNamed executive who was unusually overt in publicly supporting abortion access.
Named as one of the companies still offering abortion travel benefits and previously lobbied against abortion restrictions.
Cited as an example of a company publicly explaining a stipend for abortion-related travel care.
Named as a company that publicly discussed helping employees relocate for abortion access.