
In this Oct. 1, 2018 photo, Christin Evans, owner of The Booksmith, carries her dog Joey Pistachio as she crosses Ashbury Street along Haight Street in San Francisco. A measure on San Francisco’s Nov. 6 ballot would levy an extra tax on hundreds of the city’s wealthiest companies to raise $300 million for homelessness and mental health services.
Main Idea: San Francisco voters were set to decide on a tax on the city’s biggest businesses to raise $300 million a year for homelessness and mental health services, with Mayor London Breed opposing the plan and Salesforce founder Marc Benioff backing it.
Key Points:
Higher business taxes could raise prices, cut jobs, or face weak results if the city spends the money poorly.
New revenue could fund housing and mental health services for homeless residents and ease pressure on neighborhoods and local workers.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Major company singled out as a wealthy employer that would pay more under the tax and whose founder.
Central government actor because the ballot measure and homelessness tax are framed as a San Francisco city policy.
Named large company cited as one of the wealthiest firms expected to be affected by the measure.
Named large company cited as one of the wealthiest firms expected to be affected by the measure.
Salesforce founder and prominent supporter of the measure, with direct quoted advocacy.
Named elected official taking a central public position for a no vote on the measure.
Cited as the city where a similar tax effort failed, providing a comparative policy example.
Named company that has voiced opposition and contributed money against the measure.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentMentioned as another California city where a similar head tax was scuttled.
Mentioned as a city that will vote on a similar per-employee tax proposal.