New York strip steaks are on display at a Sam’s Club, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2025, in Bentonville, Ark. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File) Protein just got a big boost from U.S. health officials. The latest federal dietary guidelines tell Americans to “prioritize protein foods at every meal” and advise increasing daily intake — up to double the amount of previous recommendations. “We are ending the war on protein,” Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a White House post on social media.
Main Idea: U.S. health officials, led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., are urging Americans to eat more protein, but many nutrition experts say the advice goes too far and is not backed by strong new evidence.
Key Points:
Higher-protein guidance may push households toward more red meat and processed protein foods, raising costs and possibly more fat and diabetes risk.
People who lift weights may get useful support for muscle building, and clearer protein targets may help some shoppers choose whole foods.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Central official quoted endorsing the new federal protein guidance and framing the policy shift.
Named nutrition expert whose warning about consumer confusion is a major part of the article.
Named nutrition expert whose comments and published critique are central to the article’s pushback on the guidelines.
Home institution of Christopher Gardner, whose criticism of the protein messaging is a major part of the story.
Home institution of Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, whose expert critique is a major part of the article.
Institutional affiliation of Dr. David Ludwig, who is quoted offering expert context on the dietary guidance.
Quoted nutrition and endocrinology expert providing supporting commentary on the policy debate.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentPublication in which Mozaffarian’s article is cited as part of the scientific debate over protein recommendations.
Mentioned only as a supporter of AP’s Health and Science Department, not as a central actor in the.
Mentioned only as a supporter of AP’s Health and Science Department, not as a central actor in the.