
An attorney for Live Nation, Ticketmaster's parent company, pushed back against the government's claim that it is an "unlawful monopoly," stating in court on Monday that it is a “fierce, lawful competitor” in a “competitive market.” Subscribe to read this story ad-free Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content.
Main Idea: Live Nation is fighting a Justice Department antitrust case by arguing it competes fairly in the live events market, not as a monopoly.
Key Points:
If the DOJ proves Live Nation and Ticketmaster have too much market power, fans could keep facing high fees, fewer ticket choices, and more ticketing failures.
A court order could force more competition in concert booking and ticketing, which may lower costs and improve service for consumers and venues.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
No entity suggestions or linked entities saved yet.
Primary company defending itself in the antitrust trial and central to the monopoly allegations.
Lead government plaintiff bringing the antitrust case against Live Nation.
Department of Justice attorney presenting the government’s central monopoly argument.
Live Nation attorney whose opening statement is a key part of the company’s defense.
Named federal court venue handling the case and central to the legal action.
Former Ticketmaster CEO and merger-era figure expected to testify.
Live Nation CEO expected to testify and a significant executive figure in the company.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentLocation of the trial; mentioned as the setting rather than as an acting jurisdiction.
Her tour’s ticketing problems are used as prominent evidence in the case.
Listed as a potential witness in the trial and a recognizable public figure.
Historical reference point in the long-running Ticketmaster reform dispute.
Named as a company tied to a potential witness and part of the trial’s witness list.