An upstate New York judge has resigned after he got out of jury duty by claiming that he couldn't be impartial — because he thought everyone brought before a court is guilty. Richard T. Snyder, who had been a justice of the Petersburgh Town Court for about a decade, left his post after being charged with misconduct by a state judicial commission, officials said Tuesday.
Main Idea: Judge Richard T. Snyder resigned after admitting he believed people brought before his court were guilty, raising concerns about his ability to be fair.
Key Points:
A judge who openly assumed defendants were guilty can weaken public trust in courts and make people doubt fair treatment.
A resignation and misconduct review may help protect taxpayers and court users by removing a judge who could not be impartial.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Central figure who resigned after admitting he believed defendants were guilty and was charged with misconduct.
State authority is central because the judicial commission and state court system acted on Snyder’s misconduct.
The court where Snyder served as justice and whose conduct was directly implicated in the article.
State commission administrator quoted on Snyder’s misconduct and the role of judges.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to comment