Susan Crawford, who was endorsed by the Democratic Party, won the closely-watched Wisconsin Supreme Court race Tuesday night in what was the most expensive judicial election in American history. What would have normally been a sleepy nonpartisan judicial race turned into an expensive battle between Crawford, a Dane County judge, and Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel, who was endorsed by the Republican Party.
Main Idea: Susan Crawford won Wisconsin’s costly Supreme Court race, defeating Brad Schimel in an election that drew heavy national money and attention.
Key Points:
Huge spending and outside money in the Wisconsin court race could leave voters feeling the system is for billionaires, not ordinary people.
The race may help decide rulings on voting rules, unions, abortion, and redistricting that affect many households and workers.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Major outside political actor who campaigned and spent heavily to influence the race.
Crawford’s main opponent in the election and a central figure in the race’s national attention and spending.
Winner of the Wisconsin Supreme Court race and one of the two central candidates driving the article.
Official backer of Susan Crawford and a key political force in the race.
Official backer of Brad Schimel and a key political force in the race.
The state where the election occurred and whose court control is central to the story.
The court is the institution at stake, and its composition is a major focus of the article.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentThe race is framed partly as a test of sentiment toward his presidency, but he is not acting.
National political figure mentioned as an endorser and appearance draw, but not a central decision-maker in the story.
Crawford’s judicial position is identified with this county, giving local context to her candidacy.
Mentioned as a major source of advance ballots and part of the turnout analysis.
Schimel’s judicial position is identified with this county, providing local context.