A federal judge ruled Friday that President Trump's executive order targeting the law firm Jenner & Block is unconstitutional and permanently blocked the administration from enforcing it — a second setback in Mr. Trump's push to punish certain law firms. U.S. District Judge John Bates, who was appointed by President George W. Bush and is based in Washington, D.C., said the executive order is "violative of the Constitution" and found that the order infringes on the First, Fifth and Sixth amendments.
Main Idea: A federal judge blocked President Donald Trump’s order targeting Jenner & Block, ruling that it was unconstitutional.
Key Points:
The ruling blocks a presidential order that targeted a law firm, which may reduce fears of government retaliation and help protect legal defense for workers, consumers, and small businesses.
The court check may reassure voters that constitutional limits still protect clients and the justice system from political pressure.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Law firm targeted by the executive order and the primary party seeking relief in the case.
Federal judge whose ruling permanently blocked the executive order and drives the article.
Central actor whose executive order targeting Jenner & Block is the main subject of the article.
Court issuing the central rulings that blocked the administration's orders against law firms.
Attorney general quoted criticizing the court and defending the administration's position.
Another law firm mentioned as having won a separate ruling against a similar executive order.
Named lawyer singled out in the executive order, but not a central decision-maker in the story.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentMentioned only as the president who appointed Judge Bates.
Mentioned only in connection with Andrew Weissmann’s prior work.