
The U.S. Social Security Administration office is seen in Mount Prospect, Ill., Oct. 12, 2022. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh, File) WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration two victories Friday in cases involving the Department of Government Efficiency, including giving it access to Social Security systems containing personal data on millions of Americans. The justices also separately reined in orders seeking transparency at DOGE, the team once led by billionaire Elon Musk.
Main Idea: The Supreme Court let the Department of Government Efficiency access Social Security systems that hold personal data on millions of Americans, giving President Donald Trump’s team a key win.
Key Points:
Millions of Americans may face greater privacy risk if DOGE gets broad access to Social Security data, including sensitive personal and medical records.
Supporters say the access could help the Trump administration find waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Central government team whose access to Social Security data is the main subject of the article.
Central political actor behind the administration’s legal position and the broader DOGE effort.
Major figure tied to DOGE and described as its former leader; his role and fallout with Trump are.
Central decision-maker that issued the orders allowing DOGE access to Social Security systems and pausing transparency demands.
Named justice whose dissent is quoted on the privacy risks of the court’s action.
The agency whose systems and personal data are at issue in the Supreme Court ruling.
Government watchdog group that filed the transparency-related lawsuit against DOGE.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentRepresented the labor unions and retirees challenging DOGE access in the lawsuit.
Maryland judge whose order restricted DOGE access and is central to the legal dispute.
Named justice who also would have ruled against the administration.
Named justice joining the dissent; important but secondary to the main ruling.
District judge whose broader document-disclosure order is part of the second DOGE case.