
Harvard researcher who has fallen victim to the freeze on funding by the Trump administration says years of research is at risk. (AP video: Leah Willingham) Harvard University professor Alberto Ascherio opens a liquid nitrogen freezer used to store blood samples used for research at the university’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health on Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025 in Boston.
Main Idea: Harvard University researchers say a Trump administration funding freeze could halt major medical and science projects for years, including Alberto Ascherio’s work on multiple sclerosis and other diseases.
Key Points:
Harvard’s funding freeze could delay MS, cancer, and opioid research, slowing new treatments and costing jobs for researchers.
If the dispute forces Harvard to curb waste or bias, taxpayers may see better use of federal research money.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Harvard researcher whose frozen project and lost funding are the lead example in the story.
Central institution affected by the federal funding freeze and the main setting for the research disruption.
His administration’s funding freeze is the main cause of the article’s conflict and consequences.
The governmental actor imposing the funding freeze and defending the cuts.
Harvard president quoted on the university’s response and the sacrifices ahead.
Harvard public health researcher whose canceled grants and layoff concerns are a major part of the article.
Harvard unit where the research cuts, grant terminations, and staffing impacts are concentrated.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentMentioned as another university facing the administration’s pressure.
Mentioned as another university targeted in the broader dispute.
Mentioned as another university targeted in the broader dispute.
Location of Harvard’s campus in the story.
Location of Harvard and the research work, but not an acting entity in the article.