
The whole film shows either Ice Cube's computer screen or his face as seen on the monitor's camera Film critics have delivered a verdict: the new version of War of the Worlds – which stars Ice Cube as a man who must save humanity from an alien invasion without leaving his desk – is bad. But how bad? Is it just "the worst possible adaptation of HG Wells's work", external? Is it "one of the worst movies of the decade so far", external? Or might it actually be "one of the worst movies ever made", external?
Main Idea: The new Prime Video version of War of the Worlds, starring Ice Cube, is getting harsh reviews, but its very bad score is also drawing curious viewers and debate.
Key Points:
The film’s poor reviews may waste viewers’ time and money, and Prime Video could face backlash if households see Amazon backing low-quality content.
The buzz may draw some people to watch a so-bad-it’s-fun movie, giving audiences a shared topic and a few hours of cheap entertainment.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Star of the film being reviewed; the article centers on his performance and the movie built around him.
Central review-aggregator brand whose score is used throughout the article to judge the film.
The film includes a subplot about Amazon drone deliveries, making the company a notable commercial reference in the.
Entertainment Weekly critic whose revised review changes the film’s Rotten Tomatoes score.
Named actor reacting to the film’s bad reviews and drawing attention to it.
Founder of the Bristol Bad Film Club, quoted on the appeal of terrible movies.
Referenced as the creator of The Room, a key comparison for cult bad films.
Source of Jordan Hoffman’s review that nudged the film’s score upward.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentMentioned as the director of Staying Alive, used as an example of a badly received film.
Cited only for a description of The Room.