
A New Jersey man who previously sued the New York City Police Department in an unsuccessful quest to find out whether the NYPD’s Intelligence Division spied on him and fellow Muslims as part of its notorious and expansive “mosque-raking” program during the Michael Bloomberg era has filed a new open-records lawsuit against the city over spying claims, according to information exclusively provided to WIRED.
Main Idea: Samir Hashmi is suing the New York City Police Department again, seeking records that may show whether he and other Muslims were monitored under the department’s post-9/11 spying program.
Key Points:
The lawsuit could raise public concern that NYPD surveillance of Muslim communities may have violated civil rights and weakened trust in police among voters and households.
The case could push clearer records rules and oversight, which may help protect privacy and reduce abuse for communities and taxpayers.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
The department accused of spying and the target of the lawsuit and records requests.
Central plaintiff who filed the new records lawsuit and is the main individual driving the article.
Named police commissioner whose NYPD intelligence background is central to Hashmi’s concerns.
Newly elected mayor whose policing stance and personnel decision are a major part of the story.
The city is the government actor being sued over the NYPD’s records and surveillance practices.
Named civilian representative whose comments about surveillance are used as supporting context.
Elected official whose anti-Muslim statements are discussed as part of the article’s broader context.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentOne of the student organizations allegedly infiltrated by the NYPD and referenced as part of Hashmi’s experience.
The article identifies Hashmi as having been involved with its Muslim Student Association during the period discussed.
Hashmi’s co-plaintiff and a referenced figure in the earlier lawsuit, mentioned as part of the backstory.
Hashmi’s home state and part of his identification in the article, but not a central actor.