Washington — A panel of judges on a federal appeals court ruled Thursday that a district court judge did not have the authority to order the release of Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University activist who has been targeted by the Trump administration for deportation. The three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled 2-1 that the U.S.
Main Idea: A federal appeals court said a New Jersey judge did not have the authority to order Mahmoud Khalil’s release while his deportation case moves forward.
Key Points:
The ruling could let the Trump administration keep detaining some immigrants and student activists longer, which may worry households and communities about due process and free speech.
The decision may give immigration courts and taxpayers a clearer legal path for handling removal cases,.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Central subject of the appeals ruling, his detention, and the challenge to his removal proceedings.
The administration is a central actor pursuing Khalil’s detention and deportation.
Federal appeals court issuing the ruling that is the main subject of the article.
Khalil’s legal representative making a central response to the ruling.
District judge who ordered Khalil’s release and is central to the legal dispute.
Appellate judge in the majority whose vote and ruling are directly relevant.
Appellate judge in the majority whose vote and ruling are directly relevant.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentNamed official whose foreign-policy determination is a key part of Khalil’s detention.
Lower court whose jurisdiction and release order are directly at issue.
Institutional affiliation identifying Khalil and relevant to the broader protest context.
Named dissenting judge offering a significant but secondary view.
One of the countries immigration authorities said Khalil could be deported to.