
WASHINGTON — A small band of moderate House Democrats teamed with Republicans on Thursday to pass a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security, overcoming a revolt by most Democrats furious about ICE’s aggressive operations in Minneapolis and other U.S. cities. Subscribe to read this story ad-free Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content. The vote was 220-207, with seven Democrats breaking with their party and voting yes.
Main Idea: The House passed a major Homeland Security funding bill, with Speaker Mike Johnson celebrating the result while Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and most Democrats broke with the package over ICE funding.
Key Points:
House fights over ICE funding could delay a shutdown deal and disrupt paychecks, services, and agency operations for workers and households.
Passing the spending package may keep the government open and fund programs like child care, housing aid, mental health, and Pell Grants.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
The agency whose funding bill is the core legislative fight in the article.
Central legislative body that passed the spending package and amendment.
Central agency at the center of the Democratic revolt and funding debate.
Central Democratic leader whose vote, criticism of ICE, and stated position drive the article’s conflict.
Central House leader publicly touting passage of the spending package and framing the outcome.
Major political bloc split over ICE funding and central to the article’s framing.
Named lawmaker offering a major critique of Democrats’ immigration strategy and the DHS negotiations.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentLead negotiator and top appropriator whose unusual no vote on the DHS bill is a key story point.
Major political bloc whose members joined the vote and benefited from the House outcome.
Key legislative body put “in a jam” by the House-passed repeal amendment and funding package.
Top Democratic appropriator cited as part of the negotiation behind the funding deal.
Mentioned as the political context for Democrats’ immigration caution, but not a direct actor in the vote.