
President Donald Trump has repeatedly promised to end the “weaponization“ of the Justice Department, saying the previous administration abused its power to investigate political opponents. Subscribe to read this story ad-free Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content. But in recent weeks, the Justice Department has started investigating Trump's political adversaries, including one of his former opponents in the 2024 election, the head of the Federal Reserve and a former cable TV critic.
Main Idea: The Trump administration is using the Justice Department to investigate more of President Donald Trump’s political foes, raising new concerns about retaliation and political pressure.
Key Points:
The Justice Department’s focus on Trump critics may deepen fears of political retaliation and make people trust federal law enforcement less.
No clear positive impact identified.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Central figure whose complaints, social media calls, and statements about prosecutions drive the article.
Central agency described as investigating Trump’s political foes and taking concrete action through subpoenas and indictments.
Minnesota attorney general whose office received subpoenas and whose dispute with the administration is central.
New York attorney general who was also indicted and is a major target in the article.
Named Justice Department leader whose role is central to the agency actions discussed.
Former FBI director who was indicted, making him one of the article’s main examples.
Minnesota governor whose office received criminal subpoenas and who was directly targeted by Trump.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentMinneapolis mayor whose office was subpoenaed and who is discussed as a target of Trump’s criticism.
Named deputy attorney general and former Trump lawyer tied to the Justice Department’s actions.
White House spokeswoman quoted responding to the article’s premise and defending the administration.
Retired federal appeals court judge quoted giving a critical assessment of Trump’s actions.
Named by Trump as someone he wants investigated, but she is not a main focus of the piece.