
President Donald Trump announced Thursday that the Environmental Protection Agency is rescinding the legal finding that it has relied on for nearly two decades to limit the heat-trapping pollution that spews from vehicle tailpipes, oil refineries and factories. Subscribe to read this story ad-free Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content. The repeal of that landmark determination, known as the endangerment finding, will upend most U.S. policies aimed at curbing climate change.
Main Idea: The Trump administration is ending the EPA’s longtime climate finding, a move that would sharply weaken the agency’s power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.
Key Points:
EPA repeal of climate rules could mean more pollution, higher health risks, and weaker protection from heat and air quality problems for families and workers.
Some businesses, especially fossil fuel and coal companies, could face fewer federal limits and lower compliance costs.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Named agency leader announced alongside Trump and directly tied to the rollback.
The agency taking the central regulatory action by rescinding the endangerment finding and vehicle emissions standards.
Central actor who announced the EPA reversal and defended the move publicly.
Major organization that announced plans to sue over the repeal.
Major organization that announced plans to sue over the repeal.
Central state actor through Governor Gavin Newsom and the U.S. Climate Alliance response to the repeal.
Named governor and co-leader of the U.S. Climate Alliance quoted opposing the repeal.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to commentNamed governor and co-leader of the U.S. Climate Alliance quoted opposing the repeal.
Major environmental nonprofit preparing a legal challenge and quoted criticizing the rollback.
Named former president whose administration established the endangerment finding being reversed.
State-led coalition that publicly condemned the repeal as unlawful.
Law firm whose partner assessed the administration’s legal and procedural hurdles.