A federal judge ruled the Defense Department violated a court order requiring it to ease stringent restrictions imposed on reporters who cover the Pentagon and blocked a new press policy issued by the department last month. U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman again sided with the New York Times and its reporter Julian Barnes, who filed a lawsuit last year that argued the new Pentagon policy violated the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment and due process provision of the Constitution.
Main Idea: A federal judge said the Pentagon must restore press access and cannot enforce a new policy that limited reporters’ access to the building.
Key Points:
Pentagon limits on reporters can keep taxpayers and voters from getting full, timely news about military decisions and spending.
Court-ordered press access may improve oversight and give the public more reliable information about the Defense Department.
Rate how each entity in this article affected the American people.
Central government body in the press-access dispute and the target of the court’s injunction.
Pentagon agency that imposed the press policy, was found to violate court orders, and is the subject of.
Pentagon spokesperson quoted stating the department’s response and appeal position.
Attorney for The New York Times quoted responding to the ruling.
Comments here are the same thread shown when this article appears in The Pulse.
No comments on this article yet.
Sign in to comment